Saturday, June 27, 2009

7 votes

I don't know if anyone's keeping up with our politics but boy did they play a game yesterday. The cap and trade bill, which I'm still surprised it even got this far, was up for election. Though it's a green bill and sure our environment might appreciate it, it's got a lot more damage than good I'm afraid. Even if they taxed CO2 and other polluting gases, companies aren't going to stop emitting them. They are going to have to find a way to pay for the tax and its gonna trickle down to the very people the government claims it is supposed to help. And if we're not producing, surely China and other countries are going to pick up our slack and we'll have no income to even attempt to pull us out of the state of our economy. Furthermore, Obama claims that jobs will be created and the out-of-pocket money won't be that big of a difference-"a postage stamp". Wait a second. I'm old school and postage stamps have gone up to almost 50 cents per stamp, how many people do you know that send mail anymore? Though yahoo is reporting that it's only about a 100 dollar increase per household, I don't know many households that can afford even that at the moment and there's rumors that it could cost as much as $3,000. Maybe not even rumors as it sounds like Obama contradicted himself, he said earlier that 2 million jobs are going to be cut by this AND utility bills will skyrocket! 2 million jobs are going to be cut and you're telling me that it's going to help create jobs? People are claiming that this will put us as a "leader in clean energy jobs" but what good is that going to do in the long run? Aren't there environmental regulations in place already? There are too many holes in this bill, a claim that the bill is "not perfect" isn't comforting. I'm leery about this one to say the least. To top it all off, it passed by 7 votes! Sadly, many bills are passed at odd hours of the night but I do know that many American's tried to prevent this yesterday with phone calls and emails and I think that 7 vote difference resulted.

Check it out: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090627/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_climate_bill

No comments: